Fraternal order of eagles officer handbook

FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES OFFICER HANDBOOK TRIAL

In its first issue, Grand Aerie contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish that its control over Broncho was atypical of a normal parent-subsidiary relationship. Grand Aerie thereafter brought this interlocutory appeal, challenging the denial of its special appearance.

FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES OFFICER HANDBOOK TRIAL

Grand Aerie filed a special appearance, challenging all bases for the trial court s exercise of personal jurisdiction over it, but the trial court denied Grand Aerie s special appearance. Haygood filed a dram shop action against Broncho, the bartender, and Perdue s estate and, after discovery, amended his petition to include Grand Aerie as a defendant because it had a duty of supervision, oversight, and/or dominion over Broncho. The accident seriously injured Haygood and killed his fiancГѓВ©e and Perdue. Mark Perdue, a member and former president of the Broncho Aerie, had a head-on collision with Tyler Haygood and his fiancГѓВ©e after Perdue had consumed alcoholic beverages at the Broncho lodge one evening. Broncho Aerie 2914 is a local aerie located in Odessa, Texas, and incorporated in Texas. Grand Aerie issues charters to local chapters and approves their bylaws as well as any amendments. Grand Aerie is the governing body and is an Ohio corporation. FOE s hierarchy begins with the Grand Aerie and includes state and provincial aeries and local aeries. FOE helped establish Mother s Day, was the impetus for Social Security, and pushed to end age discrimination in the work place. The Fraternal Order of Eagles (FOE) is a charitable organization that supports both medical centers and medical research.

We, therefore, reverse the judgment of the trial court and render judgment that Haygood s claims against the foreign corporation are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We conclude that Grand Aerie is a nonresident corporation and that, in the context of this suit, its contacts with Texas are insufficient to establish either specific or general jurisdiction. In this interlocutory appeal, Grand Aerie Fraternal Order of Eagles challenges the trial court s order in which it denied Grand Aerie s special appearance. We deny the motion for rehearing, but we withdraw our opinion and judgment dated January 11, 2013, and substitute the following. Second, Haygood attacks our conclusion that there was no evidence that Grand Aerie approved alcohol-related policies, urging that it is undisputed that Grand Aerie approves the bylaws, which are the governing authority for social rooms. First, Haygood argues that we mischaracterized the nature of Haygood s claim as derivative instead of direct. Tyler Haygood filed a motion for rehearing in which he challenged our holding as to specific jurisdiction on two grounds. We held that On original submission, we held that the trial court committed reversible error when it for two reasons: (1) because there is not a substantial connection between Grand Aerie s contacts in Texas and the lawsuit sufficient to confer specific jurisdiction and (2) because Grand Aerie s contacts with Texas did not rise to a level that established the existence of general jurisdiction. C-130,296 OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING denied the special appearance entered by Grand Aerie Fraternal Order of Eagles. TYLER HAYGOOD, Appellee On Appeal from the 244th District Court Ector County, Texas Trial Court Cause No.

11-12-00174-CV _ GRAND AERIE FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, Appellant V. Opinion filed FebruIn The Eleventh Court of Appeals _ No.

Fraternal order of eagles officer handbook